Keyword summary
27% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,542 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Senate results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Biased Writer Voice , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 473 hits . Analysis detected 5,560 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,624 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (30,468 of 36,716 keywords). This State Senate is better (less manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group. State Senate
Keyword details
Total words: 8,624
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst