Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video727 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stanley Cup Playoffs results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 427 hits. Analysis detected 3,661 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,984 of 37,536 keywords). This Stanley Cup Playoffs is worse (more manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.
Stanley Cup Playoffs
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
69%Stanley Cup Playoffs (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,908
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

68% percentile
025507510068.1% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 14.7%14.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.2%9.2%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos