Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 727 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stanley Cup Playoffs results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Authority , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 427 hits . Analysis detected 3,661 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,984 of 37,536 keywords). This Stanley Cup Playoffs is worse (more manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group. Stanley Cup Playoffs
Keyword details
Total words: 2,908
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.1% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst