Keyword summary
8%3 analyzed articles/videos4,219 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Standardized Testing results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 3.8% saturation with 599 hits. Analysis detected 6,813 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,734 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (34,309 of 34,833 keywords). This Standardized Testing is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group.
Standardized Testing
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
2%Standardized Testing (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 15,734
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

2% percentile
02550751001.5% percentile
1.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles15.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos