Keyword summary
36% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,194 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stand Your Ground results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 700 hits . Analysis detected 4,575 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,582 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (32,286 of 37,536 keywords). This Stand Your Ground is better (less manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group. Stand Your Ground
Keyword details
Total words: 6,582
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.0% percentile 1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst