Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video573 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Stacey Graves results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.2% saturation with 262 hits. Analysis detected 2,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,719 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,445 of 37,536 keywords). This Stacey Graves is worse (more manipulative) than 66.80% of the peer group.
Stacey Graves
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
67%Stacey Graves (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,719
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

67% percentile
025507510066.8% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.8%6.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.1%6.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.2%15.2%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Keyword 4.1%4.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.7%Red Herring: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos