Keyword summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video594 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Marys results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 239 hits. Analysis detected 1,619 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,376 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (22,202 of 56,449 keywords). This St Marys is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
St Marys
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Property Transfers1%
⁠0%Madison Township1%
⁠0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
⁠0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
⁠0%Paul Demark1%
⁠61%St Marys (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,376
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510060.7% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 10.1%10.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Horn Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos