Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos943 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Louis Police results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 610 hits. Analysis detected 4,639 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,388 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (24,536 of 35,740 keywords). This St Louis Police is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
St Louis Police
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
32%St Louis Police (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,388
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

31% percentile
025507510031.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate