Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 222 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Louis Fire Department results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Unattributed Quote , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 93 hits . Analysis detected 248 faulty-reasoning hits from 666 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 73% (10,487 of 37,536 keywords). This St Louis Fire Department is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group. St Louis Fire Department
Keyword details
Total words: 666
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.1% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles666 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst