Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,382 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Louis Development Corporation results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 1,024 hits . Analysis detected 5,396 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,746 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,633 of 37,536 keywords). This St Louis Development Corporation is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group. St Louis Development Corporation
Keyword details
Total words: 5,746
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
40% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.7% percentile 2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 17.8% 17.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst