Keyword summary
68%1 analyzed article/video1,013 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Elmo Brewing Co results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 563 hits. Analysis detected 2,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,039 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (21,014 of 37,536 keywords). This St Elmo Brewing Co is better (less manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
St Elmo Brewing Co
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
44%St Elmo Brewing Co (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,039
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

44% percentile
025507510044.0% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 18.5%18.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos