Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video85 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spiked Summit results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Negativity Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 42.1% saturation with 143 hits. Analysis detected 994 faulty-reasoning hits from 340 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 13.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (924 of 36,558 keywords). This Spiked Summit is worse (more manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group.
Spiked Summit
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠98%Spiked Summit (selected)14%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 340
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

98% percentile
025507510097.5% percentile
13.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles340 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 42.1%42.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 37.1%37.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 27.4%27.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 27.4%27.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.5%13.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 18.2%18.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 29.4%29.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 23.8%23.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 42.1%, sitewide 0.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 37.1%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Keyword 29.4%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 27.4%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 27.4%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 23.8%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 6.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 0.6%Burden of Proof: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 0.4%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Primacy Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos