spiked⁠93%

‘Without a border, we’re not a country’ ⁠88%

By spiked⁠0%

6/28/2026, 11:55:02 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 67.1% saturation with 57 hits. Analysis detected 448 faulty-reasoning hits from 85 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 81.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠88% (2,540 of 21,164 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 88.00% of the article peer group.

Zia Yusuf – Reform UK’s home-affairs spokesperson – made a surprise appearance at the inaugural spiked summit on Saturday. 
He spoke to spiked editor Tom Slater about how the establishment will seek to frustrate a Reform government, the half-a-million-pound cost of mass migration, and the uselessness of Britain’s ruling class. 
Become a spiked supporter to get discounted tickets to our events, access all of spiked’s exclusive content, and get unlimited, ad-free reading and other perks. 
Sign up here. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 36.5%spiked: 7.6%spiked: 8.8%Confirmation Bias36.5%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 2.9%spiked: 3.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.8%spiked: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 37.6%spiked: 26.2%spiked: 8.4%Framing Effect37.6%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.4%spiked: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 2.7%spiked: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.9%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 6.0%spiked: 2.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 44.7%spiked: 35.5%spiked: 12.9%Negativity Bias44.7%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 36.5%spiked: 1.7%spiked: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias36.5%This article: 0.0%spiked: 8.8%spiked: 3.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 4.6%spiked: 4.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 1.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.7%spiked: 1.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 22.4%spiked: 1.0%spiked: 1.1%Recency Bias22.4%This article: 22.4%spiked: 1.0%spiked: 0.6%Primacy Effect22.4%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 36.5%spiked: 7.7%spiked: 7.4%Ad Hominem36.5%This article: 0.0%spiked: 3.6%spiked: 5.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 2.6%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 8.2%spiked: 3.2%spiked: 3.9%False Dilemma8.2%This article: 0.0%spiked: 4.0%spiked: 3.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 36.5%spiked: 16.8%spiked: 15.0%Hasty Generalization36.5%This article: 0.0%spiked: 2.6%spiked: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 3.4%spiked: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 58.8%spiked: 19.0%spiked: 7.9%Appeal to Emotion58.8%This article: 0.0%spiked: 6.8%spiked: 2.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 36.5%spiked: 1.7%spiked: 1.0%Burden of Proof36.5%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.7%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 1.5%spiked: 3.9%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 8.2%spiked: 4.1%spiked: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.2%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.2%spiked: 1.1%spiked: 2.5%Unattributed Quote8.2%This article: 8.2%spiked: 4.4%spiked: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection8.2%This article: 22.4%spiked: 27.4%spiked: 25.5%Biased Writer Voice22.4%This article: 3.5%spiked: 7.5%spiked: 3.2%Indoctrination3.5%This article: 0.0%spiked: 0.0%spiked: 0.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 67.1%spiked: 26.3%spiked: 9.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias67.1%This article: 32.9%spiked: 28.3%spiked: 1.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…32.9%

85 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers92%attributed speech7writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageZia Yusuf • 19 words • 100.0% coverageZia Yusuf • 31 words • 100.0% coveragespiked • 25 words • 100.0% coveragespiked • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Zia Yusuf

100%flagged-word coverage
50 attributed words64% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-100.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%Zia Yusuf: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-100.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%Zia Yusuf: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning +0.0 ptsWriter: 100.0%Zia Yusuf: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+38.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Zia Yusuf: 38.0%38.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.