Keyword summary
92%1 analyzed article/video392 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spending Bill results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.3% saturation with 298 hits. Analysis detected 1,444 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 81% (6,920 of 35,626 keywords). This Spending Bill is worse (more manipulative) than 80.60% of the peer group.
Spending Bill
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
81%Spending Bill (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,176
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

81% percentile
025507510080.6% percentile
5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 14.7%14.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 25.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.1%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos