Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,199 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Spac results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 420 hits . Analysis detected 4,723 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,921 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,775 of 37,536 keywords). This Spac is better (less manipulative) than 66.00% of the peer group. Spac
Keyword details
Total words: 5,921
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.0% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst