Keyword summary
33%2 analyzed articles/videos2,848 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Soybeans results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.3% saturation with 644 hits. Analysis detected 6,940 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,176 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (30,066 of 35,692 keywords). This Soybeans is better (less manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group.
Soybeans
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
16%Soybeans (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,176
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

16% percentile
025507510015.8% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate