Keyword summary
6% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,968 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Soldiers results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 1,106 hits . Analysis detected 8,484 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,730 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (34,956 of 36,716 keywords). This Soldiers is better (less manipulative) than 95.20% of the peer group. Soldiers
Keyword details
Total words: 15,730
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.8% percentile 1.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst