Keyword summary
26%2 analyzed articles/videos2,588 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Soft Power results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Indoctrination, and Biased Writer Voice, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 1,110 hits. Analysis detected 10,044 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,157 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (30,210 of 37,536 keywords). This Soft Power is better (less manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Soft Power
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
20%Soft Power (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 13,157
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

20% percentile
025507510019.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos