Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,831 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Support results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, In-Group Bias, and Halo Effect, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 33.9% saturation with 1,831 hits. Analysis detected 8,130 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (7,498 of 34,728 keywords). This Social Support is worse (more manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
Social Support
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
79%Social Support (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,408
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

78% percentile
025507510078.4% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 33.9%33.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 23.5%23.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Anecdotal: Keyword 33.9%, sitewide 5.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 23.5%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos