Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video3,527 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Networking results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 1,751 hits. Analysis detected 12,330 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (30,728 of 37,536 keywords). This Social Networking is better (less manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group.
Social Networking
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠19%Social Networking (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 14,108
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

18% percentile
025507510018.1% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles14.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 12.4%12.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos