Keyword summary
30%1 analyzed article/video689 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Social Apps results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 528 hits. Analysis detected 1,730 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,067 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (12,056 of 37,536 keywords). This Social Apps is worse (more manipulative) than 67.90% of the peer group.
Social Apps
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
68%Social Apps (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,067
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

68% percentile
025507510067.9% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 25.5%25.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.6%4.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 25.5%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos