Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,703 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Soccer Fans results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 1,077 hits . Analysis detected 5,077 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,109 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (15,857 of 37,536 keywords). This Soccer Fans is worse (more manipulative) than 57.80% of the peer group. Soccer Fans
Keyword details
Total words: 5,109
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
58% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.8% percentile 3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 21.1% 21.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.5% 14.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 21.1%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst