Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,349 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Socal Edison results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 823 hits. Analysis detected 4,509 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,047 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,813 of 37,536 keywords). This Socal Edison is worse (more manipulative) than 68.50% of the peer group.
Socal Edison
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
69%Socal Edison (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,047
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

69% percentile
025507510068.5% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.8%14.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.4%6.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 20.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.0%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos