Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,643 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Simple Science results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 961 hits. Analysis detected 6,493 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,652 of 37,536 keywords). This Simple Science is better (less manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.
Simple Science
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
40%Simple Science (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,572
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510039.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.5%6.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos