Keyword summary
44%1 analyzed article/video1,487 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Signature Requirements results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 607 hits. Analysis detected 3,253 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,461 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (23,581 of 35,675 keywords). This Signature Requirements is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group.
Signature Requirements
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
34%Signature Requirements (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,461
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

34% percentile
025507510033.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos