Keyword summary
75%1 analyzed article/video1,233 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sigal Chattah results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 571 hits. Analysis detected 3,589 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,932 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 49% (28,514 of 54,887 keywords). This Sigal Chattah is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Sigal Chattah
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Property Transfers1%
0%Madison Township1%
0%Buc-Ee's Travel Center1%
0%Buc Ees Travel Center1%
0%Paul Demark1%
49%Sigal Chattah (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,932
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

48% percentile
025507510048.1% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.5%6.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos