Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,231 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shooters results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 644 hits. Analysis detected 2,865 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,693 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (14,604 of 34,798 keywords). This Shooters is worse (more manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group.
Shooters
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
58%Shooters (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,693
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

58% percentile
025507510058.0% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos