Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video705 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shibuya Ward results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and In-Group Bias, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 310 hits. Analysis detected 1,945 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 63% (14,202 of 37,536 keywords). This Shibuya Ward is worse (more manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group.
Shibuya Ward
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
63%Shibuya Ward (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,820
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

62% percentile
025507510062.2% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos