Keyword summary
83% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,328 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sher Edling results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 1,473 hits . Analysis detected 10,907 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,484 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (14,619 of 37,536 keywords). This Sher Edling is worse (more manipulative) than 61.10% of the peer group. Sher Edling
Keyword details
Total words: 7,484
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.1% percentile 3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 19.7% 19.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.1% 17.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 19.7%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst