Keyword summary
78% 1 analyzed article/video 565 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shenzhen New World results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof , Unattributed Quote , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 26% saturation with 440 hits . Analysis detected 2,699 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,695 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,261 of 37,536 keywords). This Shenzhen New World is worse (more manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group. Shenzhen New World
Keyword details
Total words: 1,695
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.7% percentile 6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 18.6% 18.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 26.0% 26.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 16.5% 16.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 14.0% 14.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 26.0%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 0.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 14.0%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Red Herring: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst