Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,658 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sheng Thao results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Confirmation Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 913 hits . Analysis detected 6,662 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,632 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (32,303 of 37,533 keywords). This Sheng Thao is better (less manipulative) than 86.10% of the peer group. Sheng Thao
Keyword details
Total words: 10,632
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst