Keyword summary
95%1 analyzed article/video326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shenanigans results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 45.5% saturation with 445 hits. Analysis detected 1,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 978 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,092 of 37,536 keywords). This Shenanigans is worse (more manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group.
Shenanigans
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
84%Shenanigans (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 978
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

84% percentile
025507510083.8% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles978 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 45.5%45.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 45.5%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.6%No True Scotsman: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.1%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos