Keyword summary
79% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,583 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sharyn Alfonsi results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 1,906 hits . Analysis detected 13,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,885 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (17,808 of 37,536 keywords). This Sharyn Alfonsi is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group. Sharyn Alfonsi
Keyword details
Total words: 10,885
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.6% percentile 3.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 17.5% 17.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.1% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst