Keyword summary
79%4 analyzed articles/videos1,583 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sharyn Alfonsi results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.5% saturation with 1,906 hits. Analysis detected 13,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,885 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (17,808 of 37,536 keywords). This Sharyn Alfonsi is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Sharyn Alfonsi
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
53%Sharyn Alfonsi (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,885
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
3.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 17.5%17.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.1%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate