Keyword summary
96% 2 analyzed articles/videos 778 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sharice Davids results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 935 hits . Analysis detected 6,611 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,714 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 67% (12,682 of 37,530 keywords). This Sharice Davids is worse (more manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group. Sharice Davids
Keyword details
Total words: 4,714
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.2% percentile 3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.0% 16.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 19.8% 19.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.8%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 2.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst