Keyword summary
41%1 analyzed article/video555 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shapiro Fundraising Pennsylvania Governor Campaign Finance results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Optimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 468 hits. Analysis detected 1,959 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (14,582 of 37,536 keywords). This Shapiro Fundraising Pennsylvania Governor Campaign Finance is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Shapiro Fundraising Pennsylvania Governor Campaign Finance
Keyword details
Total words: 2,220
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510061.2% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 21.1%21.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 16.5%16.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 6.1%6.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Horn Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos