Keyword summary
41% 1 analyzed article/video 555 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Shapiro Fundraising Pennsylvania Governor Campaign Finance results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Unattributed Quote , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 468 hits . Analysis detected 1,959 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (14,582 of 37,536 keywords). This Shapiro Fundraising Pennsylvania Governor Campaign Finance is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group. Shapiro Fundraising Pennsylvania Governor Campaign Finance
Keyword details
Total words: 2,220
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.2% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.1% 21.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 16.5% 16.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.3% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst