Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 3,207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sgv Progressive Action results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,620 hits . Analysis detected 10,826 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (30,570 of 37,536 keywords). This Sgv Progressive Action is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group. Sgv Progressive Action
Keyword details
Total words: 12,828
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles12.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst