Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Sexual Texts results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , In-Group Bias , and Red Herring , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 362 hits . Analysis detected 2,365 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Sexual Texts is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Sexual Texts
Keyword details
Total words: 3,800
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Red Herring: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 0.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.1% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.3% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst