Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,163 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sergio Fraire results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 29.5% saturation with 1,030 hits . Analysis detected 3,388 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,489 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,895 of 37,536 keywords). This Sergio Fraire is worse (more manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group. Sergio Fraire
Keyword details
Total words: 3,489
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.3% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 29.5% 29.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Keyword 29.5%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst