Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Septic Complications results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 303 hits . Analysis detected 1,379 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,058 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Septic Complications is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Septic Complications
Keyword details
Total words: 5,058
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Straw Man: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst