Keyword summary
16%2 analyzed articles/videos1,653 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Septa results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 330 hits. Analysis detected 2,978 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,588 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (33,689 of 37,536 keywords). This Septa is better (less manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Septa
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
11%Septa (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,588
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

10% percentile
025507510010.2% percentile
1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate