Keyword summary
65% 1 analyzed article/video 1,244 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seniors & Retirement results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 25.9% saturation with 1,290 hits . Analysis detected 3,165 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,976 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 56% (23,993 of 54,518 keywords). This Seniors & Retirement is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group. Seniors & Retirement
Keyword details
Total words: 4,976
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.0% percentile 2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 25.9% 25.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 25.9%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst