Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,121 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Politics results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Burden of Proof, with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 591 hits. Analysis detected 5,477 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,484 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (20,202 of 37,536 keywords). This Senate Politics is better (less manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
Senate Politics
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
47%Senate Politics (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,484
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

46% percentile
025507510046.2% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 13.2%13.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.1%13.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.5%9.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 0.4%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos