Keyword summary
32% 2 analyzed articles/videos 252 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Debate results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 254 hits . Analysis detected 1,414 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,394 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,770 of 37,536 keywords). This Senate Debate is better (less manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group. Senate Debate
Keyword details
Total words: 2,394
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 39.3% percentile 2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst