Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 662 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Deal results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , In-Group Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 508 hits . Analysis detected 4,266 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,648 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 88% (4,558 of 37,536 keywords). This Senate Deal is worse (more manipulative) than 87.90% of the peer group. Senate Deal
Keyword details
Total words: 2,648
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.9% percentile 6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 17.4% 17.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 17.8% 17.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 19.2% 19.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 5.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst