Keyword summary
80% 2 analyzed articles/videos 81 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Candidate results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Framing Effect , and False Dilemma , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.7% saturation with 200 hits . Analysis detected 1,372 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,072 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.3% and a BS Rank of 83% (6,545 of 37,326 keywords). This Senate Candidate is worse (more manipulative) than 82.50% of the peer group. Senate Candidate
Keyword details
Total words: 1,072
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 82.5% percentile 5.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst