Keyword summary
11%1 analyzed article/video1,297 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Bill 125 results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 234 hits. Analysis detected 1,131 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,891 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (32,081 of 37,536 keywords). This Senate Bill 125 is better (less manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group.
Senate Bill 125
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
15%Senate Bill 125 (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,891
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

15% percentile
025507510014.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.9%1.9%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Middle Ground: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos