Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Senate Backs Iran War Powers Resolution results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 360 hits . Analysis detected 1,899 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,216 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Senate Backs Iran War Powers Resolution is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Senate Backs Iran War Powers Resolution
Keyword details
Total words: 3,216
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst