Keyword summary
43%1 analyzed article/video854 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sen Michael Bennet results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Genetic Fallacy, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 297 hits. Analysis detected 1,658 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,562 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (19,296 of 37,533 keywords). This Sen Michael Bennet is better (less manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group.
Sen Michael Bennet
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
49%Sen Michael Bennet (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,562
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

49% percentile
025507510048.6% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.0%10.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos