Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,231 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Secretary Of Homeland Security results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 882 hits . Analysis detected 3,618 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,693 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (11,420 of 37,536 keywords). This Secretary Of Homeland Security is worse (more manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group. Secretary Of Homeland Security
Keyword details
Total words: 3,693
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.6% percentile 3.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 23.9% 23.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 23.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.5% Red Herring: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst