Keyword summary
⁠23%2 analyzed articles/videos1,701 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Second Chance Act results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.2% saturation with 448 hits. Analysis detected 4,758 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,221 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠29% (26,744 of 37,536 keywords). This Second Chance Act is better (less manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group.
Second Chance Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠29%Second Chance Act (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,221
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

29% percentile
025507510028.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 1.4%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos