Florida high school student-athlete ECG requirement: How screenings work 43%

7/22/2026, 4:53:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 496 faulty-reasoning hits from 583 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.4% and a BS Rank of 43% (12,627 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 57.70% of the article peer group.

For thousands of Florida families, the back-to-school sports checklist has a new requirement this year. 
Florida student-athlete ECG requirement 
Beginning in the 2026-27 school year, incoming ninth-grade athletes and students in grades 10 through 12 participating in an FHSAA sport for the first time must complete a one-time electrocardiogram, or ECG, before they can practice or compete under Florida's new Second Chance Act . 
The law was passed to help detect potentially dangerous heart conditions that can lead to sudden cardiac arrest in young athletes. 
The conditions often show no warning signs. 
FOX 13 received exclusive access inside a heart screening clinic run by the nonprofit Who We Play For, where technicians demonstrated the process that many Florida families will now experience before the start of the school year. 
How the high school heart screening works 
The screening itself takes only a few minutes. 
Technicians place small adhesive electrodes on a student's chest, arms and torso before connecting them to an ECG machine that records the heart's electrical activity. 
The test is painless and does not use needles or electricity. 
"There are no needles hidden, and we don't stab you," Krysti Jonas, heart screening director for Pinellas and Hillsborough counties with Who We Play For, said. 
"It's just stickers. 
They might be cold, but that's all you're going to feel." 
Doctors later review the tracing for abnormalities that could indicate an underlying heart condition requiring additional evaluation. 
Why Florida added the requirement 
Supporters of the law say the additional screening fills a gap left by traditional sports physicals. 
According to organizations supporting the screenings, approximately one in 300 young people have an undiagnosed heart condition that could increase the risk of sudden cardiac arrest. 
Research has also shown ECG screening can detect many conditions that routine physical examinations may miss. 
Jonas said the technology gives families an opportunity to identify potential problems before an emergency happens. 
"As a mom, knowing that I can do something that takes three minutes that could potentially save her life is huge," Jonas said, while describing why she plans to have her own daughter screened. 
"We're all about preventing that and helping throughout the whole process." 
Parents say the process is 'easy' 
Parents who brought their children to the clinic described the new requirement as another step toward keeping young athletes safe. 
"It wasn't really a big deal to us," parent Jeremy Kelly said. 
"It was just something else that we can make sure he'd be okay to play sports and not have any issues. 
It's not hurting anything to be a little more cautious." 
Kelly also said registering for the screening was straightforward. 
"It was easy," Kelly said. 
"Just go right on, and you can pick the location that's convenient for you and whatever time slot works and get it done." 
Students who completed the screening also described the experience as much easier than they expected. 
"It was really easy," volleyball player Lauren Shannon said. 
"You just heard a beep, and then it took like five seconds." 
What happens if a screening finds something? 
An abnormal ECG does not automatically prevent a student from playing sports. 
Instead, the student must undergo additional medical evaluation and receive written clearance from a qualified healthcare provider before participating in athletics, according to FHSAA requirements. 
Schools require documentation that the screening has been completed before covered student-athletes become eligible to participate. 
Head to this site or this resource to schedule a screening. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.5%FOX 13 News: 2.1%Confirmation Bias5.5%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 1.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%FOX 13 News: 3.6%Availability Heuristic5.7%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 1.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%FOX 13 News: 6.7%Framing Effect1.9%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 1.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 5.8%FOX 13 News: 4.1%Optimism Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 1.4%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 7.3%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%FOX 13 News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%FOX 13 News: 0.7%In-Group Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.6%FOX 13 News: 1.1%Recency Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.5%FOX 13 News: 4.6%Appeal to Authority5.5%This article: 1.7%FOX 13 News: 0.6%False Dilemma1.7%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.5%FOX 13 News: 2.6%Hasty Generalization4.5%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.8%FOX 13 News: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion5.8%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 21.6%FOX 13 News: 3.4%Anecdotal21.6%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 4.5%FOX 13 News: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection4.5%This article: 9.3%FOX 13 News: 2.5%Biased Writer Voice9.3%This article: 1.9%FOX 13 News: 2.9%Indoctrination1.9%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FOX 13 News: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.9%FOX 13 News: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.9%

583 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers39%attributed speech356writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageFOX 13 • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageKrysti Jonas • 26 words • 100.0% coverageKrysti Jonas • 3 words • 0.0% coverageKrysti Jonas • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageKrysti Jonas • 16 words • 0.0% coverageKrysti Jonas • 34 words • 0.0% coverageKrysti Jonas • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJeremy Kelly • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJeremy Kelly • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJeremy Kelly • 9 words • 0.0% coverageJeremy Kelly • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJeremy Kelly • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Shannon • 9 words • 0.0% coverageLauren Shannon • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jeremy Kelly

100%flagged-word coverage
68 attributed words30% of attributed speech45% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.8 ptsWriter: 4.8%Jeremy Kelly: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -3.1 ptsWriter: 3.1%Jeremy Kelly: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.